Workfare to be fixed part of social safety net

Dec 4, 2006 Workfare to be fixed part of social safety net Help scheme for low-income will be reviewed, adjusted but here to stay: PM By Li Xueying THE Workfare bonus for low-income workers will become a permanent feature of Singapore's social safety net, starting with a three-year run. It will be reviewed and adjusted after that, but the scheme is here to stay, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said yesterday. 'Workfare is going to be the fourth pillar of our social safety net,' he said, pledging a significant commitment to extend permanent help for the low-income group. It will join the Central Provident Fund, the 3Ms of healthcare (Medicare, MediShield and Medifund), and the home ownership scheme, in undergirding the web of aid programmes here. 'So it's a critical part of our system, and it will ensure that we will systematically support and protect low-income Singaporeans,' said PM Lee at a People's Action Party event. Party cadres hailed it as a fundamental shift in government thinking, one that acknowledges that there will be those who need continuing help even as the economy as a whole does well. PM Lee, secretary-general of the ruling PAP, was speaking to 1,000 cadres at the 29th Ordinary Party Conference which elected the party's central executive committee. In his speech, delivered in Malay, Mandarin and English, he also touched on external relations and the PAP's values. The Workfare announcement comes a month after PM Lee's pledge at the opening of Parliament, to 'tilt the balance' of help towards lower-income Singaporeans affected by globalisation. 'It's a big move,' he said yesterday. 'We thought about it for a long time...but we've decided it's the right thing to do.' He defined Workfare thus: 'For every dollar you earn through your own efforts the Government will give you something to match.' Part of it will be in cash but most of it will be ploughed into the CPF, for housing, health care and retirement. It would be for three years initially as the Government still needed to figure out the best way to do it, he said. Second Finance Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam will give the details in the Budget on Feb 15. This year's Workfare Bonus was a one-off measure that some 330,000 low-wage, older workers received. The payout came to $150 million. Workfare is a major reason, said PM Lee, for the impending hike in the goods and services tax (GST) from 5 to 7 per cent. It would have been much easier for the Government to 'keep things as they are, no GST increase, everybody will be happy'. But this was neither a responsible nor honest approach, he said. 'Better be upfront with Singaporeans, speak long-term, move now, prepare for the future and put in place a system, build up our resources, our ammunition so that when something unexpected happens, we will be able to respond quickly.' The GST hike will add $1.5 billion to Singapore's coffers annually, said PM Lee, who is also Finance Minister. He listed certain demands on the money - paying for Workfare, an ageing population that would also mean an increase in spending on health care and infrastructure, and investing in the future, from education to transport. But some of the extra revenue should also be saved for 'unknown unknowns', he added. 'You may have Sars, you may have some other crisis. Better keep some of our powder dry.' He acknowledged that the hike was unpopular, but said he was convinced it was the right thing to do, in order to help the low-income. 'We have to take the tough decisions,' he said. At the same time, an offset package is being put together to cushion the impact. There will be something for the middle-income group and the elderly, he promised. But ultimately, more will be for the low-income, whose wages will not rise as fast. Speaking in Mandarin, PM Lee said the poor will receive 'far more' than what they pay in higher prices. He also addressed the question posed by some on why basic items could not be exempted from the GST hike. Better-off families spend more than the poor and old, he said, and hence such a move will benefit the better-off more. Summing up, PM Lee said he was 'confident that our policies will bear fruit'. 'It will take some years but we are heading in the right direction and this will strengthen our position. By the next election in 2011, the PAP will be ready to present its report card to Singaporeans. 'Then judge us on our performance: whether the economy has grown, whether people have better jobs, better lives, whether we live in a harmonious society.' xueying@sph.com.sg

Party activists hold key to 'swing' voters

Dec 4, 2006 Party activists hold key to 'swing' voters MINISTER of State for Education Lui Tuck Yew was elected barely seven months ago, but is already thinking about the next election. Speaking to more than 1,000 party cadres, he said one challenge before the PAP is to win over 'swing' voters ahead of the next general election. 'We must work to consolidate the backing of the PAP's core supporters and win over the 'swing' voters to our side,' Rear-Admiral (NS) Lui said. 'We can be sure the opposition is trying to do the same as they put together better qualified and more credible candidates.' Analysts say the PAP's base of core supporters has traditionally ranged from 40 per cent of all voters in an opposition ward, to 60 per cent in a PAP ward. Swing voters are those who may be swayed by a range of factors, unlike loyal supporters of either PAP or the opposition. What strategy did the MP for Tanjong Pagar GRC put forward to win these voters? The former navy chief proposed preparing party activists to play a greater role in future elections as more wards are likely to be contested. These activists are integral to the party, he said, paying tribute to those in his branch by declaring 'I am nothing without them'. 'Headquarters will find fewer uncontested candidates and their supporters to run the HQ, to man the operations room, to craft messages for the fliers and to organise rallies. We will have to rely on specialist teams of activists to take on these and other functions. We need to start to identify these people, train them early and test them out.' RADM Lui recognised the desire of party activists, especially those younger, to have a greater say in policies as 'healthy and constructive'. Where he felt they were needed most, however, was in being informed to explain policies on the ground - and even in cyberspace. He said they should help put information out there to win people over, and could even supply their views 'to moderate the vitriol and balance the skewed comments' on the Internet.

Guard against politics of envy: MP

Dec 4, 2006 Guard against politics of envy: MP By Zakir Hussain BISHAN-Toa Payoh GRC MP Josephine Teo is troubled by what she sees as a growing trend here: the labelling of certain Singaporeans as part of an elite. The elite include two groups: the rich and Singaporeans who have won government scholarships and work as policymakers in the civil service. But what she finds disturbing is the way the elite are portrayed. They are depicted as people who do not understand the problems of ordinary folk, and are only keen to advance their own interests. Totally ignored is the fact that they may have come from humble backgrounds or worked hard to get where they are. Such portrayals are 'highly divisive', Mrs Teo told PAP cadres yesterday. They foster the wrong perception 'that a certain class of citizens are more valued than others', she said, adding: 'This is clearly untrue, or we would not take pains to build an inclusive society.' She saw this labelling as one expression of what she termed the 'politics of envy' - in which those who fare better or are seen to get more from the Government become objects of envy. The PAP, she stressed, had to guard against this politics of envy, as it threatened social cohesion. It could manifest itself in other ways, she said, such as neighbours feeling left out because they had to pay for lift upgrading, unlike those who had lifts serving their floors. Such envy could also be felt when people compare the level of state spending on items like health care here with that in other countries, and conclude that the Government is not doing enough to help needy Singaporeans. Comparisons like these could be used to get support to lobby the Government to do what is popular, but not necessarily in Singapore's long-term best interests, she said. The challenge, therefore, is for the party to reach out to all groups and assure them the PAP will do its best for them. Otherwise, there will be dissatisfaction with the party, she said. The party has also strengthened the social safety net, and must work to improve social mobility for the poor, she added. Its activists must keep their ears close to the ground, help people understand the decisions behind unpopular policies and continue being 'a party that takes action' by helping residents. Marine Parade GRC MP Fatimah Lateef also told cadres that compassion and empathy are two key words that will help the party weather challenges. She said: 'For us to be good cadres, we must have a genuine concern for the people. But for us to be great, we must all inculcate that deep sense of empathy.'

Fresh approach crucial to avoid class barriers as the country enters a new phase

Dec 4, 2006 Meritocracy, Singapore style Fresh approach crucial to avoid class barriers as the country enters a new phase By Lynn Lee THE need for Singapore to avoid class barriers between the haves and have-nots, which typically emerge when societies mature, was stressed by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong. Playing a key role in this effort is one of the PAP's core ideals: meritocracy. But it has to be pursued with a fresh approach as Singapore enters a new phase, said Mr Lee. What is crucial now is to ensure that every talented Singaporean, no matter how poor, is able to move up through many avenues. But how far each goes depends on his ability and drive. So, 'we're talking about equal opportunities, not equal outcomes,' he said, when he identified the four ideals that will continue to guide the PAP in its efforts to take Singapore forward. The others are racial and religious harmony, enterprise and inclusiveness. He laid out these all-important signposts yesterday when he mapped out the party's role in a changing world to about 1,000 PAP cadres at a conference. Mr Lee, who is its secretary-general, noted that Singapore was at a turning point, with globalisation requiring its people to adapt continually to changes. But the years of pursuing meritocracy have seen many people from poor backgrounds move up. Their children have done well too, said the Prime Minister. With time, it will be harder to find the same numbers of children from humble backgrounds moving up, he added. So, 'it makes it all the more important that we must... keep the avenues open and give a child from a poor family every opportunity to get a good education.' For this reason, there are 'first-class' schools in all neighbourhoods, each with its special strengths and spirit. Also, the needy can get financial help to send their children to kindergarten, he said. But these opportunities will not promise that everyone ends at the same finish line. So, he warned, 'we must not end up selfish'. Urging the successful to give those behind a helping hand, he reminded them that the system and many 'helping hands', many of which may have gone unnoticed, helped them succeed. 'Don't trample on others to get to the top because if you do that, you will fail,' he said. Meritocracy is also key in maintaining racial and religious harmony here. Singapore would be torn apart if, for instance, either the majority or the minority is favoured over the other, he said. Issues of race and religion are sensitive as well in South-east Asia, where terrorism is a real threat. This threat makes racial harmony even more important because in the event of a terror attack, ties among the races will come under strain. To keep the economy humming, the PAP has had to focus on enterprise. In other words, get people to work for themselves. In doing so, Mr Lee wants Singaporeans to stop expecting the Government to make things happen all the time. 'If you see something not right, put it right. You see something you want to do, do it. Move. And if you succeed, good for you.' The last ideal, inclusiveness, centres on helping everyone feel they are moving forward together, and benefiting from Singapore's success. The PAP is a party which represents the whole of society, stressed Mr Lee. It was a voice for all races, religions and classes, including the size-able middle class who are the 'centreground' for Singapore politics, he said. 'And we want to bring everyone together to achieve the best for Singapore, because I think that's the way we can do well for ourselves,' he said. lynnlee@sph.com.sg

Workfare to be a permanent feature of Singapore's social safety net: PM Lee

Majulah PAP!

Workfare encourages Singaporeans to take up jobs whenever they can and be productive. The government has rightfully taken the stand that those who try to help themselves should be helped the most. This is a reasonable viewpoint and prevents us from sliding down the slippery slope of welfarism in which unproductive and lazy members of society simply leech off those who are hardworking and seek to depend on their own effort for a living.

Just ask yourself: would you rather that the taxes you pay and schemes for the needy be given to those who are sincere in standing on their own two feet, or to any Tom Dick or Harry who only has the intelligence to fill out an application form correctly? Look at the situation in European countries like Sweden or Denmark, and you will have no problems agreeing with me.

Minimum Wage does not protect employees from abuse as there will always be ways to get around it. It will, as I have explained in another thread, make Singapore less competitive and cause the poor to suffer even more in the long run. It is far better to have workfare, which is a system of rewarding the productive and hardworking.

Workfare to be a permanent feature of Singapore's social safety net: PM Lee
By Farah Abdul Rahim, Channel NewsAsia | Posted: 03 December 2006 1741 hrs

SINGAPORE: Workfare will be a permanent feature of Singapore's social safety net in the future, says Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong.

He said this will tilt the balance in favour of low-income Singaporeans.

Singapore has recently been dealing with an increasing income gap and how to level up those who cannot cope with globalisation.

The three-year Workfare scheme, which will be announced on Budget Day in February, will be reviewed before it continues beyond the initial three years.

Continuation of the Workfare Bonus aims to encourage the lower income worker to stay employed.

For every dollar earned, there will be a matching reward from the government part cash and the rest in the CPF account.

Mr Lee said Workfare will be the fourth pillar of Singapore's social safety net, besides the existing three pillars of the Central Provident Fund, the 3M of MediSave, MediFund and MediShield, as well as housing.

This will help to ensure there are more systematic support and protection for low-income Singaporeans.

Workfare is one major reason why the Government decided to increase the Goods and Services Tax (or GST), as it will bring in some S$1.5 billion more in revenue annually.

"It's easier not to increase GST and keep things as they are. It may be ok for now, but Singapore will be in serious trouble after 5 years or so. So I thought it's better to be upfront with Singaporeans, think long-term now to prepare for the future, put in place a system and build ammunition so that when something unexpected happens, we can respond quickly," the Prime Minister said.

Besides paying for Workfare, the revenue raised from the GST hike will also go to higher healthcare spending, preparing Singapore for an ageing population and investing in the future, such as in education and housing.

But Mr Lee assured that help will be at hand for those who cannot cope with the increase.

"We'll have a comprehensive off-set package more than adequate to care for Singaporeans and help them adjust. It'll be weighted towards the lower end. Some of the middle-income and sandwiched classes are (only) confident government will care for low-income so they complain and ask for help. So don't worry, we have not forgotten you. As for older Singaporeans, we will continue to help especially those who are less well off."

Mr Lee also explained that the decision to raise the GST may be unpopular, but it is the right thing to do.

"In government, we have to bite the bullet even if it's not a popular decision. It's a tough business. We have to take tough decisions and ask if we're doing the right thing for all and if it's the right thing, we go ahead and do it. At the same time, we have to explain to all and help them accept it.

"I am confident the policy will bear fruit and this will strengthen our position and be ready with our report card for the next GE. And then people can judge us based on our results and whether people have better lives then. We are upfront and give the bitter medicine first; worry first and enjoy later."

Mr Lee was speaking to some 1000 members at the People's Action Party Conference. - CNA/so

PAP intensifies efforts to reach out to the young

The PAP government (may the PAP progress!) is always looking for ways to connect with Singapore's youth and engage them productively.

Nov 27, 2006
PAP intensifies efforts to reach out to the young

A PLAN to help young Singaporeans promote their causes, and get more youth groups working together are the latest bid by young PAP MPs to get their generation to bond better with the country.

Already, each of the 12 MPs in the P65 team - the name the PAP MPs born after 1965 go by - is in charge of a number of areas of interest.

Now, they want youngsters with a cause to go to them with their ideas, or use them as 'resource persons' when launching a project.

On their part, the MPs will see how they can get youth groups with the same aims to team up for their plans.

These new approaches of the P65 were reported in the latest issue of the People's Action Party organ, Petir.

Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC MP Teo Ser Luck said the team wanted to exploit to full advantage their diverse interests when connecting with Singapore's young.

'This is how we can best relate to them. Now they know who they can go to,' said Mr Teo, who is parliamentary secretary at the Community Development, Youth and Sports Ministry.

For example, enthusiasts of early-childhood education can turn to Pasir Ris-Punggol MP Michael Palmer.

Sembawang GRC MP Lim Wee Kiak's focus is on family life while Marine Parade GRC MP Faishal Ibrahim is concerned about the needy and the ageing population.

They had talked about these subjects in their maiden Parliament speeches this month. Sports, volunteerism, women issues, the Arts and ethnic culture are other areas of interest.

Youths who want to know more about which MP can best represent them may write to blog www.p65.sg.

Enlightened Sammyboy Forummer WOLONG123: Chee Soon Juan is OUT TO CHEAT Singaporeans' money!!!

A very enlightened Sammyboy Forummer with the nick of wolong123 has pointed out correctly that the political gangster Chee Soon Juan is OUT TO CHEAT Singaporeans' money. This is his original post at the Sammyboy Coffeeshop Forum: http://forums.delphiforums.com/n/mb/message.asp?webtag=sammyboymod&msg=125244.1

******************

in one of my postings i pointed out the fact tht $$$$ contributed to SDP defence fund would go directly into Chee S C personal acct not the party acct. Ms Chee has every intention to cheat sporeans of their hard earned $$$$, hence i urged all sporeans not contribute a single cent to this fund. its a sham front cover to cheat ur $$$

******************

This is my reply to wolong123's post:

That is very correct. Chee Soon Juan is a nincompoop and a leaden-footed ninny who is a cheat, a liar and a disgrace to Singapore politics. His ribald stunts and his arrogant, haughty approach to politics impresses no one. Any thinking Singapore would, and should, write him off immediately. Any Singaporean who contributes a single cent to his bank account is indirectly guilty of abetting the shoddy gutter politics that Chee Soon Juan shamelessly indulges in.

I urge all Singaporeans to open their eyes, see the moral corruption of this crass political gangster, and withdraw all support from him immediately. Such an idiosyncratic and irrational political wannabe has no place in our Great Motherland. I curse him and his sister from the bottom of my heart, and the heart of my bottom!

Goh Bock Seng

I'm so proud of the PAP

I am extremely proud that we have a strong and competent government like the PAP (may the PAP progress!) in charge. With the PAP at the helm, I always know Singapore is in safe hands and we will prosper over the long run.

The policy I am most proud of is the foreign talent policy. Recognizing the harsh realities of globalization and fully cognizant of the fact that left alone, our own national fertility rate is insufficient to sustain a healthy population size, the PAP government (wise and learned they are!) has opened up to foreigners in a grand way in the hopes they will find jobs here and eventually settle down. Foreigners bring a wealth of talent and open up new markets in Singapore, and make this a truly vibrant and endearing place to live, work and play!

Our competent and incorruptible PAP government (O Great Men & Women of Asia!) is never afraid to enact unpopular policies for the long term good and stability of Singapore, unlike the other so-called democratic governments who have fallen prey to welfarism and sacrifice the long-term good of the nation in favour of popular policies that bring benefits only in the short term. The reason why we are such a wealthy, prosperous and competitive nation is because the PAP (give praise and thanks to them!) always does what is right and good for Singapore, and never yields to its senseless and irrational critics.

I am proud to be Singaporean, and I am heartened that my sons will, like me, serve NS with pride and joy, with stout hearts full of purpose and courage. I have brought my children up to love our Great Motherland and revere our enlightened and uncorruptible leaders. They know where they belong, and would gladly lay down their lives for Singapore.

Majulah PAP! Majulah Singapura! Give praise and blessings to MM Lee, PM Lee, and the PAP government, and let us all rally together in the Great and Noble Cause of Nation Building!

Till tax do us part

Nov 19, 2006

Till tax do us part

Fed up with being taxed heavily for welfare services he didn't benefit from, Finn moves to S'pore

By Ken Kwek

TWO months ago, futures trader Mika Sampovaara trekked for a week through the Cambodian jungle, along the famed Mekong River trail.

It was an adventure he had long dreamed of, but never had the chance to pursue until he left his homeland for Singapore two years ago.

However, being in the region was not the only factor that allowed him to indulge in his passion for travel. He also had the time and, more importantly, the money.

Before arriving here, Mr Sampovaara was part of Finland's welfare system, which taxed more than half of his income.

It caused him to flee its shores, he said in a letter to The Straits Times Forum page on Thursday.

He warned of the system's pitfalls in his letter which came amid the recent parliamentary debate here on how Singapore should avoid going down the risky road of welfarism.

When he was in Finland in the 1990s, Mr Sampovaara was a high-flying economist, stock analyst and broker.

Though he enjoyed his work, the hours were gruelling and his earnings put him in Finland's highest tax bracket of 60 per cent.

'For every $100 I earned, more than $60 was going to the state. It was frustrating because most of it went into welfare subsidies which I wasn't benefiting from,' he said.

Yet before he started working, Mr Sampovaara had in fact profited from the Finnish system.

As a master's student in Helsinki in the early 1990s, he enjoyed two years of free education and was given a housing grant as well.

Does his criticism of welfarism not strike him as hypocritical, given that he had enjoyed the fruits of the welfare state and has now left his country?

Mr Sampovaara's reply: 'Well, I contributed taxes for over five years in Finland. I've more than paid my dues to society.'

In 2000, he moved to Switzerland with his Russian wife Tanya, and worked for an Icelandic investment bank.

Four years later, drawn by the warm weather and lower tax rates, they moved to Singapore. Arriving in April 2004, they settled into a condominium apartment in Bukit Timah.

Mr Sampovaara set up his own company, trading in Japanese futures on the Singapore Exchange Derivatives Trading (SGX-DT). He pays a concessionary tax rate of 10 per cent under a special scheme for companies dealing in approved commodities.

The new arrangement allows the couple, both permanent residents, to lead a lifestyle that Mr Sampovaara says is 'much more relaxed'.

As his own boss, he puts in just three hours a day for the business, about one-fifth of the hours he clocked in as the director of an investment bank.

His earnings here are less than half of his gross income in Finland and Switzerland, yet after paying taxes, his net income is not much less than before.

'In the end, what the lower taxes have afforded me is time, which is the ultimate luxury,' he said.

Given his experiences, his serious reservations about the welfare system of Finland and other European states come as no surprise. Welfarism has also driven many of his friends to flee to greener pastures, he said.

Though the welfare system does benefit a segment of society, such as the elderly and middle-class families with children to support, Mr Sampovaara feels it has severely diminished the work ethic of the Finnish people.

It was probably a factor that crossed Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong's mind last Monday when he told Parliament that the system in Scandinavian countries was not suitable for Singapore.

The Government would find other ways of 'tilting the balance' in favour of the lower-income group, PM Lee said.

One approach being considered is to give a series of offset packages to help the poor manage an impending rise in the goods and services tax (GST).

PM Lee had announced last Monday that the GST will go up from 5 to 7 per cent, and said the money was needed to pay for more Government spending to help the lower-income.

Mr Sampovaara believes the Government is on the right track in its bid to narrow the income gap.

'Giving cash to the poor is more targeted. The money goes to those who need it, without punishing the rest of society,' he said.

He insists his objection to welfare subsidies in such areas as education and health care is not because he lacks compassion for the needy.

Rather, the fault lies in the nature of the welfare system, which provides subsidies for the masses 'indiscriminately', thus becoming susceptible to abuse by those who do not need the aid.

'The welfare system impinges on those who are willing to go out and make a living while providing for others with little incentive to work.'

The Singapore system works, he said, because 'at the end of the day, people are still accountable for themselves'.

kenkwek@sph.com.sg

Singapore held up as a model for the region

Majulah PAP!! Majulah Singapura!!

Singapore is held up by President George W. Bush as the finest model for the Asian region! This goes to show that our esteemed leaders have been doing the right thing all along and have brought immense wealth and prosperity to our Great Motherland! Let us all unite in the Great and Noble Cause of Nation Building!!

Nov 17, 2006
Singapore held up as a model for the region

By Chua Mui Hoong

US PRESIDENT George W. Bush yesterday said he saw Singapore as a model for the region, as a country which overcame poverty through opening up to free trade.

On his second visit to Singapore in three years, President Bush said: 'We've got a lot in common, particularly our desire to continue to promote free and fair trade, because your country has shown that open markets are capable of lifting up an entire people.'

Speaking after an hour-long meeting with Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong at the Istana in the afternoon, he added: 'And I congratulate you on your leadership; congratulate the people of Singapore for really being a model for the neighbourhood.'

Summing up the discussion, PM Lee said they covered a range of issues, including security and terrorism.

'On many of these areas, we not only exchanged notes, but found a significant degree of matching in our views,' said PM Lee, adding that this was because the two countries' interests were aligned.

'Singapore is very happy that America has a stake in the region, and is growing the stake in the region. And we would like to help this to happen and to ensure that this continues for a long time to come.'

Singapore as an exemplar of Asia was a theme that President Bush returned to in the evening, during a 30-minute-long address at the National University of Singapore's University Cultural Centre to an audience that included diplomats, academics, students and religious leaders.

He began by tracing the 'deep and enduring' ties between America and Singapore that started in the 1830s, when the first American counsel came to promote American trade in this region.

The counsel's wife was the daughter of one of America's most famous patriots, Paul Revere.

She donated a bell cast by the Revere Foundry to the old St Andrew's Church. It is now in the National Museum and is 'a symbol of the long affection' between the people of the two nations, said President Bush.

'The story of Singapore is a story of people who overcame challenges and transformed a small port city into one of the most prosperous nations on Earth,' he said, noting that pessimists had doubted Singapore's ability to survive as a tiny nation with no natural resources.

'By your effort and enterprise, you have proven the pessimists wrong. And today Singapore has one of the most vibrant economies in the entire world,' said the President, who added that he felt very comfortable in Singapore and in meetings with its leaders.

Singapore's transformation is 'a story of Asia', he noted.

Like Singapore, the region was 'mired in poverty' after World War II, went through war and occupation, and survived colonialism and destabilising movements.

Like Singapore, many Asian countries overcame the difficulties. 'And the Asia we see today is the fastest growing and most dynamic region in the world.'

America had a stake in Asia's success and would continue with its open trade policies that would help Asia grow, he stressed.

muihoong@sph.com.sg

Health Minister Khaw pledges full GST offsets for subsidised patients

The PAP government (may the PAP progress!) is always on the lookout to help the needy and the less fortunate in society. The latest proposed increase in GST from 5% to 7% will help fund schemes to benefit the lower income groups in Singapore. In addition, Health Minister Khaw pledges full GST offsets for subsidised patients.

Nov 14, 2006
Health Minister Khaw pledges full GST offsets for subsidised patients

HEALTH Minister Khaw Boon Wan says the Government will try to fully offset any GST increase on medical costs incurred by subsidised patients, following the announcement to raise the Goods and Services Tax to seven per cent, from the current 5 per cent.

He made the pledge in Parliament on Tuesday, when the House resumed debate on the President's Address.

Mr Khaw said Singapore spends about 4 per cent of GDP on healthcare services. He said to meet the future needs of the population, it is not possible to keep healthcare expenditure in this region indefinitely.

'It is bound to increase. This increase will have to come from all stakeholders: Government, employers, insurers, patients and their families. This is part of the reason why GST has to go up,' he said.

'But I will recommend to the MOF (Ministry of Finance) to fully offset any GST increase on medical costs incurred by subsidised patients, as we did in the previous GST offset package,' he said.

In his speech, Mr Khaw said the Government will continue to enhance the existing healthcare framework and marshal enough resources to meet the rising demands of a fast ageing population for healthcare services.

He said as Singapore's population continues to age, the Government will try to slow it down by raising births and stepping up immigration.

'The better prepared we are for this inevitable demographic change, the better we can ensure that elderly Singaporeans face old age with confidence, calm and peace of mind,' he said.
He highlighted six areas that will see further enhancements.

First, Medisave will cover three more chronic illnesses (stroke, high blood pressure and high cholesterol) from next January.

'But my interest in this scheme goes beyond funding. I hope the scheme will raise the level of care for these common chronic illnesses so that the patients can avoid several complications in the future,' said Mr Khaw.

'My ambition is to make Singapore the best in the world for diabetic patients, where there is early detection of disease and effective long-term care of the disease in the community,' he added.

Second, MOH is planning a 'sequel' to last year's MediShield Reform. 'If there is public support, I hope to further increase the MediShield payout for patients with large hospital bills,' said Mr Khaw.

Third, at each budget cycle, the government will apply to the Ministry of Finance (MOF) for top-ups to Medifund and Eldercare Fund.

'So far, I am grateful for MOF's understanding and have been successful. I will continue to try but I know that this assumes health budget surpluses,' he said.

Fourth, Mr Khaw pledged to press on with greater information sharing so that patients make informed choices and hospitals can learn best practices from one another.

Fifth, the Government plans to publish public service standards at hospitals and how well they are being met to help hospitals focus on the key concerns of patients.

Sixth, the Government has implemented in polyclinics the policy of differential subsidies among citizens, permanent residents and foreigners.

'This way, we keep heavy health subsidy as a citizen's privilege while requiring foreigners to pay for their own cost. PRs continue to be subsidised although slightly less than citizens. We will look into extending this policy to hospitals,' said Mr Khaw.

GST will go up to 7 per cent

The GST is raised to 7% to help the PAP government better fund schemes to help the needy. PM Lee (may MM Lee be pleased with him!) has already stated that social packages for low income groups will fully offset the increase in GST. So the net result is that the more well-off in society (like scholar888 for instance, whom all of you like to vilify, for some strange reason I cannot fathom) are taxed at a higher level and the extra revenue given to the poor.

I am in full support of this policy, which is yet another enlightened step taken by the PAP (may the PAP progress!) to help the less fortunate in society. I simply cannot comprehend why all of you are hurling abuse at this policy which will be a social leveller tilted in favour of the poor and lower income groups.

Nov 14, 2006

GST will go up to 7 per cent

PM pledges more help in several areas, and more regular Workfare bonuses

By SENIOR POLITICAL CORRESPONDENT, Lydia Lim

THE Goods and Services Tax (GST) will go up from 5 to 7 per cent to pay for more government spending to help the lower income.
Mapping out his government's plan for the next five years and beyond, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong yesterday pledged to 'tilt the balance' of public spending in favour of lower-income Singaporeans, who are not benefiting as much as other groups from economic growth.
New social measures include more help in education, housing and health care and more regular Workfare bonuses - a shift from a once-off measure - for the lower-income workers.
To foot the bigger bills, Mr Lee announced two new measures to raise government revenue.
The first is the GST hike, the details and implementation date of which will be revealed in the Budget, on Feb 15 next year.
The second is a plan to spend more of the returns from investing the nation's reserves. Right now, the Government can only spend half of such returns, or 'net investment income', defined to include dividends and interest. The definition will be broadened to include realised capital gains. The move is significant, requiring an amendment to the Constitution and 'working out' details with the Elected President.
In his first speech to the new Parliament and rounding up the debate on the President's Address, Mr Lee sketched out how globalisation had changed the environment for workers and widened the gap between incomes at the top and bottom.
'It's essential for us to tilt the balance in favour of lower income Singaporeans because globalisation is going to strain our social compact. That's why we are doing all this,' he said.
'But I would like to caution members that we should proceed with care...it is a real slippery slope. And many, many social welfare schemes which have ended up in serious trouble have started off with good intentions.''
Mr Lee made a firm pledge that the Government would put in place a comprehensive package to fully offset the impact of the GST hike. It would be weighted in favour of the middle- and lower-income and the elderly needy.
'It's not just a GST increase, it's a package which will fully offset the impact of the GST for these groups and begin to strengthen the social safety nets and tilt the balance in favour of the lower income Singaporeans,' he said.
As for the timing, Mr Lee said: 'I think it's better to do this now when the economy is doing well. Then we can manage the adjustments, we have the flexibility to adjust our programmes depending on how things turn out.'
Later, to opposition MP Low Thia Khiang's remark that the GST offset package would only be for a few years, Mr Lee replied: 'He has not seen my offset package. It is not just an offset package to deal with the GST.
'It is the whole set of measures which we are taking in order to tilt the playing field in favour of the lower income groups, which is what you have to add and tally in the balance.'
He message to them: 'Don't worry. You will be all right.'
The GST was first introduced in 1994, at 3 per cent, and raised to 5 per cent in 2004. Yesterday, Mr Lee said that even at 7 per cent, it is still lower than that in nearly all countries with GST or value-added tax.
Singaporeans enjoyed a 'high quality but cheap government', Mr Lee said. Public spending stands at 14 to 15 per cent of the country's total output, or GDP - among the lowest in the world.
He also made clear that Singapore would not go down the route of Scandinavian countries, with generous welfare funded through high taxes that sap the incentive to work. Singapore would instead stick to its current social model based on wealth creation, self reliance, and individual savings and spending within one's means.
Moving ahead, the Government will work to strengthen the social safety nets to benefit all income groups. How? By building on key pillars of the system - Central Provident Fund (CPF) savings, health care and housing.
The CPF will be enhanced, to help workers earn better long-term returns. There will also be improvements to the 3M schemes through which Singapore pay for health care: Medicare, MediShield and Medifund. Health Minister Khaw Boon Wan will speak on this issue in Parliament today.
And the Government will find ways to help Singaporeans unlock the value of their homes.
Lower-income families will receive extra help. Mr Lee promised 'more Workfare schemes in future', through which low-wage workers get income top-ups.
Such families will also get more support for their children's education and additional housing grants of up to $20,000, with the sum going up over time.
Despite the challenges ahead, Mr Lee urged Singaporeans to also remember to celebrate all that was right about their country. 'Our prospects have never been brighter, our overall environment is positive, our economy is vibrant, our people are well-educated and equipped to excel in a globalised world,' he said.

Think you're safe? Then a terror attack will hurt more

The PAP government (may the PAP progress!) is ever on the alert for terror threats and is unwavering in its commitment to keeping our borders safe and protecting our Great Motherland from terrorist attacks.

It is because of the high level of vigilance and our steadfast guard against terrorist elements that I can sleep in peace every night, knowing that every step humanly possible has been taken to make Singapore safe and secure.

Nov 14, 2006
Think you're safe? Then a terror attack will hurt more
Jaya warns against vigilance fatigue and complacency in fight against terror
By DEFENCE CORRESPONDENT, David Boey

THE irony about the fight against terror is this: The longer Singapore keeps terrorists at bay, the more likely its people will feel immune to the threat.

Deputy Prime Minister Professor S. Jayakumar yesterday said security planners were more concerned about the twin bogeymen of vigilance fatigue and complacency than any named terrorist group.

Awareness of the peril must therefore not flag, he said: 'Lives can be healed, property repaired and our economy rebuilt, but our gravest concern is that a successful terrorist attack could tear apart - in an instant - our racial and religious harmony and our multi-cultural society that we have worked so hard to build up over the decades.'

In an address to 400 security planners and analysts at the annual National Security Seminar, he warned that it could only be a matter of time before terrorists struck, and that if Singapore had been secure for so long, 'the psychological impact of an attack will be that much more damaging'.

Prof Jayakumar, who is also Coordinating Minister for National Security and Minister for Law, pledged to keep the people on their toes and on guard against disasters.

Security planners will continue to involve people in realistic emergency exercises. They will also have dialogues with community and business leaders to drive home the message that Singapore remains high on terrorists' hit lists.

Thus far, security planners have used Singapore's compact, 700 sq km landmass to their advantage, Dr Bernard Loo, an assistant professor in war studies at the Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies, told The Straits Times.

He noted that planners here 'can do things that other people can only dream of precisely because we're small and tightly controlled', compared to larger countries, where porous borders presented policing problems.

Singapore's response to terrorism in the five years since the Sept 11 attacks in the United States is chronicled in a 96-page book to be sold at $10 in bookstores from this weekend.

Published by the National Security Coordination Secretariat, a government agency spearheading counter-terrorism strategies, it is titled 1,826 Days: A Diary of Resolve. The title refers to the number of days since the 9/11 attacks.

It gives an overview of the measures that have been put in place to strengthen Singapore's maritime, aviation and overland borders, as well as its efforts to prepare the people to deal with terror attacks and to train crack teams to manage these.

Going forward, a 'hearts and minds campaign' will be key in the fight against terror, said Prof Jayakumar.

He cited the results of the annual National Security Awareness poll, which said nine in 10 people were confident the Government would be capable of 'a swift recovery' following a terrorist attack, up from 83 per cent in last year's survey.

In the poll, which surveyed 525 people between August and September, 82 per cent of respondents said security measures were 'sufficient to prevent the threat of terrorist attacks', up from 76 per cent in 2005.

Numbers aside, Mr Ridzuan Wu, chairman of the Centre for Contemporary Islamic Studies, said Singaporeans ought to take more ownership in preparing for the worst.

Mr Wu, who, with leaders from other religions organised an inter-religious dialogue in March, said: 'Security planning shouldn't just be top down. A bottom-up approach is also vital - we don't have to wait for the Government to do everything for us.'

Tearful dad hopes there's no cover-up (in Malaysia)

This is a follow up story in the Straits Times on the brutal murder of the Mongolian model Altantuya Shaariibuu. In Malaysia, all the father can do is hope that there is no cover-up. Can you imagine that? In another country like Malaysia, people still live in fear that the police will cover up cases of crimes where the accused comes from a powerful or wealthy family.

Can there be anymore doubt in our minds that Singapore is the best place to work and live in? In Singapore, no one has to worry about security or protection under the law. No one has to worry that there will be corruption or a cover-up in the event that the accused is politically powerful. We can be assured in Singapore that our elite and professional police force (may the PAP government be pleased with them!!) will carry out their duties efficiently and without fear or favour to anyone, not even the most wealthy or politically powerful. Only in Singapore can we live with this peace of mind!

Majulah PAP! Majulah Singapura!

Nov 12, 2006
Tearful dad hopes there's no cover-up

He has given police blood samples from his wife as well as other evidence from Mongolia
By MALAYSIA CORRESPONDENT, Leslie Lau

KUALA LUMPUR - THE father of murdered Mongolian model Altantuya Shaariibuu made his first appearance before the media yesterday, telling reporters he hoped there would be no cover-up in the investigation into her death.

Fighting back tears, Mr Shaariibuu Setev said he is still praying that the remains found by police last week were not those of his daughter.

'The whole world knows about the incident. I hope there is no cover-up. But I am satisfied with investigations so far.

'All I want is a transparent, straightforward investigation. Until the DNA results are out I do not want to say more,' he said in Mongolian, while his niece, who wanted to be identified only as Amy, acted as his interpreter.

Her eyes concealed by wraparound Christian Dior sunglasses, Ms Shaariibuu's cousin stroked her mobile phone throughout the press conference, seemingly focused on its Sitting Buddha screensaver.

She did not appear to be mouthing any prayers, but the mantra she kept repeating in response to the volley of questions from reporters was: 'We hope and pray she is still alive. We will not say too much until the DNA results are out.'

More than 50 reporters and cameramen had crammed into the office of Mongolia's honorary consul to Malaysia, Datuk Syed Abdul Rahman Alhabshi, bombarding them with questions about the relationship between Ms Shaariibuu and her lover.

Mr Setev and Miss Amy, clearly not enjoying the attention, did not answer.

Mr Setev has given investigators blood samples from his wife, along with other evidence from Mongolia.

Police are trying to match DNA samples to identify the remains found in a ditch near a dam outside the city last week, which police suspect belong to Ms Shaariibuu. It is believed she was shot and her body blown up with explosives.

At one stage during the press conference, Mr Setev was asked to identify a series of pictures, purportedly of his daughter, that were published in The Star newspaper yesterday.
The pictures show a scantily clad woman bearing a striking resemblance to Ms Shaariibuu, in a series of provocative poses.

With a pained look on his face, Mr Setev glanced at the pictures and turned away, saying to his niece he did not know if it was her.

He refused to say whether he had ever met his daughter's alleged lover, but confirmed that he last saw her on Oct 7, when she left home for Malaysia.

Miss Amy came to Malaysia on Oct 22 to look for her cousin after her family lost contact with her. She was last seen on Oct 19.

leslie.lau@excite.com

In Search of Goh Bock Seng

This is a post I made in Sam’s Alfresco Coffee shop Forum at the URL:

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sammyboymod/messages/?msg=123406.1

Today, I am very heartened by the brutally honest, no-holes-barred post by Scholar888. Unlike the cowardly swines like SingForever who participate in groupthink and have a mega-herding mentality, Scholar888 is refreshingly direct and is never afraid to call a spade a spade.

So now I would also like to share with you what I represent.

I, Goh Bock Seng, diehard PAP supporter, worshipper of the Great Cause of Nation Building, represent those ideas in this forum that are held by some forummers, but are hardly expressed due to personal fear or doubt.

I represent those views that are seldom giving a fair airing in this forum because of the pervasive groupthink that is taking place.

I stand for the Truth, which is: Singapore is the best country in Asia to work, to play and to live in, because the PAP (may the PAP progress!) has created a thriving metropolis from scratch, and brought wealth and prosperity to our Great Motherland through enlightened policies that focus on the long-term.

I champion the Foreign Talent policy, because that is the only way Singapore can survive in the 21st Century. Foreigners create a multitude of jobs and open up fresh new markets in the long run, and make Singapore a far more vibrant place. We should welcome foreign talent with wide open arms and humbly ask them to make Singapore their home.

And my most important message is: Let us rally together in the Great and Noble Cause of Nation Building! Majulah PAP! Majulah Singapura!

Goh Bock Seng

Private enterprise to have bigger role in coming years

The PAP government (may the PAP progress!!) is committed to creating economic and social propserity for Singapore. Their foreign talent policy is also one of the most enlightened policies they have every implemented! With such a competent and wise government, who can possibly feel left out? Let us all rally together in the Great and Noble Cause of Nation Building!

 

Goh Bock Seng

 

Nov 7, 2006
Private enterprise to have bigger role in coming years
Maximum growth targeted to make most of good times

By Erica Tay

MAKING the most of favourable road conditions to power ahead at full speed: This is the kind of economic path Singaporeans can look forward to in the coming years.

Trade and Industry Minister Lim Hng Kiang outlined his key plans for the coming term in his ministry's addendum to the President's Address.

He said the Government will promote economic development, 'maximising growth while external conditions are conducive'.

To do so, Singapore must be nimble and adaptable to change, he said.

Mr Lim also pointed to a bigger role for private enterprise in the coming years.

'The Government will continue to make the business environment more enterprise-friendly, moving out of areas where the private sector can play a better role.'

Talent, enterprise and ideas take centre stage in his vision for Singapore to be a 'leading global city'.

'We will foster economic growth, press on with restructuring, and create jobs by seizing opportunities in a time of rapid change and increasing competition,' said Mr Lim.

His aim is for Singapore to build on its strengths and undertake more sophisticated tasks within electronics, chemicals, biomedical sciences, engineering and supply chain management.

In addition, Singapore's reputation for trust can be the basis on which to grow service industries such as education, health care and business services, he noted.

Efforts to grow the research and development sector will be buoyed by Singapore's five-year Science and Technology Plan 2010.

Mr Lim also outlined how Singapore will build economic links with regions from South-east Asia to the Middle East.

'Singapore is at the heart of a resurgent Asia and well-connected to the world. We will step up our engagement with our partners, and deepen economic linkages by building closer ties at the provincial and state levels,' he said.

Mr Lim highlighted plans to nurture a thriving enterprise sector - through the work of agencies such as Spring Singapore and the Competition Commission of Singapore.

Finally, he spoke on the importance of the people element in driving the economy.

His ministry, together with the Education and Manpower ministries, will help Singaporeans develop their talent, upgrade their skills and have fulfilling careers, he said.

Said Mr Lim:'We will also welcome international talent to live and work in Singapore.'

ericatay@sph.com.sg

---

What is the internet to you?
Contribute to the Yahoo! Time Capsule and be a part of internet history.

Singapore Govt to grow earnings to pay for emerging social needs

Our enlightened PAP government (may the PAP progress!!) always looks very far ahead and plans well for the challenging future! Their attention to detail and their strategic policies are simply the best of the breed!

 

Majulah PAP! Majulah Singapura!

 

Goh Bock Seng

 

Nov 7, 2006
Govt to grow earnings to pay for emerging social needs
Contractual age for deals will be lowered to 18 to boost entrepreneurship

By Erica Tay

ONE of the Finance Ministry's tasks in the coming years is to find ways to increase the revenues it collects, at a time when income tax rates have to be kept competitively low while social expenditure is expected to rise.

Thus, during his new term as Finance Minister, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong pledged that the priority will be to help Singaporeans 'stay together and move ahead'.

In his addendum to the President's Address, Mr Lee said that the Finance Ministry aims to balance the Budget over the business cycle and at the same time promote opportunities for economic growth and create good jobs for Singaporeans.

To boost entrepreneurship, the ministry will lower the contractual age for business transactions, proprietorships, partnerships and directorships from 21 years to 18 years.

'Changing demographics and growing social needs are pushing up social expenditure,' said Mr Lee.

'At the same time, the Government has had to reduce income tax rates amid increasing global competition to attract investments and encourage enterprise and talent,' he added.

'The Government will therefore continue to explore how best it can preserve and grow revenues, without undermining economic growth, so as to fund the necessary expenditures.'

The Singapore Totalisator Board, for one, will increase its donations towards social and community causes, Mr Lee said.

Another focus would be to grow and protect Singapore's reserves 'through judicious and prudent investments for optimal financial returns'.

These investment earnings will go towards paying for emerging needs including in health, education, and research and development, Mr Lee said.

He said the Government will also foster a business-friendly environment via the tax framework, regulatory regime and infrastructure such as the trade and logistics portal, TradeXchange.

Finally, Mr Lee outlined plans to further develop e-Government and streamline public sector processes.

Meanwhile, Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong delivered his addendum to the President's Address as Minister-in-charge of the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS).

The MAS, which now falls under the Prime Minister's Office, will 'enhance its forecasting, surveillance and research capabilities', said Mr Goh.

In its role as a financial industry regulator, as local players go regional and become more complex, the MAS will intensify efforts in consolidated and integrated supervision, he added.

ericatay@sph.com.sg

---

What will the world find in 2020?
Leave a part of your 2006 in the Yahoo! Time Capsule. Contribute now!

5th least corrupt country

5th least corrupt country

Singapore is the fifth least corrupt country in the world, according to Transparency International's 2006 Corruption Perceptions Index.

It measures perceived levels of public sector corruption in 163 countries.

On a scale of 0 to 10, Singapore's score was 9.4, compared to 9.6 for Finland and Iceland, the two countries perceived to be the least corrupt.

 

http://www.todayonline.com/articles/153083.asp

---

What will the world find in 2020?
Leave a part of your 2006 in the Yahoo! Time Capsule. Contribute now!

Govt takes decisions that benefit majority

Nov 4, 2006 Govt takes decisions that benefit majority It is a rational process, MM tells students, citing the controversial decision over Integrated Resorts
By Peh Shing Huei
MINISTER Mentor Lee Kuan Yew shared with students Singapore's philosophy of governance which he said was about solving problems to benefit people.
The Singapore way is not to pretend to have the perfect solution, but to try and find one that brings about the maximum benefits for the most number of people.
As he said in his opening remarks at an hour-long dialogue with students from the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy: 'If you want to do well, it's up to you. You get your act together, you get your country going, you create order and stability, make learning an advantage in life, make hard work rewarding and not thieving and then you will prosper, the whole country will prosper. That to me is good governance.'
While the dialogue spanned a myriad topics, from the battle against corruption, to the historical baggage of East Asian nations, one subject kept students on the edge of their seats as they asked him, in different ways, about the art of governance.
Giving his take on the subject, Mr Lee said that for the Singapore Government, it was a rational problem-solving process.
'It's not shrouded by superstition, or religious or other biases,' he said in response to a Chinese student who wanted to know the lessons that developing Asian countries could learn from Singapore.
'We are, most of all, rational people who think clearly, and, we hope, effectively come to the right conclusions.'
The key is to weigh the balance and make a decision, he said, citing the decision over integrated resorts (IRs) to show how the Singapore Government dealt with 'very difficult questions'.
Despite being personally against gambling and knowing that it would probably do 'some harm' to Singapore, he said he had to accept that it was a changed world now compared to when he was a university student in the 1940s.
Then, only French principality Monaco had a casino. Now, they are in many major cities and coming to Asia. And Asians are going to places like Las Vegas, Melbourne and Macau to gamble.
Thus, Singapore decided to have one. But not before it set conditions so that families could bar relatives from entering.
'So weighing that balance, we decided yes, we may have casualties, but as against those casualties, the gain in getting these big shows, getting these big conventions to come to Singapore, which goes with the casino which is part of the Integrated Resort, is enormous.'
Indeed, land prices at Marina Bay, the site of one of the two IRs, have risen even before the resort is built, he said.
And Mr Sheldon Adelson, the owner of Las Vegas Sands. which will build the Marina Bay IR, told him that he was quite confident of bringing thousands of people for conferences to the resort.
Said MM Lee of the casino decision: 'Is it cost-free? I don't think it will be completely cost-free. Is it cost-containable? Yes.'
The balance in governance extended to the management of competition and compassion too, he said.
Using the yin and yang symbol, he said in response to another question: 'If you have too much of the yang, highly effective, your society will have a certain amount of friction. If you have too much the yin, you lose your drive.
'I think in Singapore's case we've got to keep on moving the balance... At no stage do we take away from the high performers too much, so that they decide 'I'm not going to perform, I'm going to migrate.' Then the music stops.'
He was visiting the Lee Kuan Yew School for the first time since it was officially opened last year, and he also launched Managing Globalization: Lessons From China And India, the first book published by the school.
Said Indian student Chetan Shrivastava, 40: 'The dialogue was great, an excellent chance to see a living legend up close. We were extremely fortunate to meet him in person.'

How we respond in emergencies determines our worth as a nation

3 Nov 2003
'Today' newspaper

by Val Chua

Emotions ran high on a balmy Sunday night as the normally stoic Senior Minister Lee Kuan Yew nearly broke down while recounting the ordeal his wife went through in London recently.

The troubles that the couple faced - including joining a queue in a free hospital - when Mrs Lee was hit by stroke two Sundays ago, revealed how differently two systems worked.

"I cannot tell you how restless and unhappy we felt," he said at a community event in Jalan Bukit Merah yesterday.

"We run a (healthcare) system where you have to co-pay ... but you get the attention. There, no attention, just join the queue," he said grimly.

The first sign of trouble was that there was no private hospital with CT scan facility at night in London, he told residents and community leaders.

So, Mrs Lee had to go to the NHS hospital nearest to the Four Seasons Hotel where they were staying - a free facility called the Royal London Hospital - and join the queue.

"We waited 45 minutes for the ambulance for a 10-minute drive," said Mr Lee in his first public appearance since the couple returned on Friday.

"In Singapore, within half-an-hour, you would be in SGH (Singapore General Hospital), TTSH (Tan Tock Seng Hospital) ... and within one-and-a-half to two hours flat, you'd know what went wrong."

When Mrs Lee reached The Royal London Hospital at 12.30am, it happened to have three cardiac arrest patients.

Mr Lee was told his wife's brain problem was "not as important" as the cardiac arrest cases, he recounted solemnly. She would have had to wait till 8am the next morning for her CT brain scan if 10 Downing Street had not intervened to get her early attention. High Commissioner Michael Teo had sought help from 10 Downing Street at 2am on Sunday and she received treatment at 3.30am on the night itself.

"Once upon a time, it was a wonderful hospital. But after 40 plus years ... the system cannot deliver. There's no connection between those in the system and the patients," he said.

But it's the way free healthcare systems work, he added, noting that Singapore must not go down that path, even though there are calls for free C class wards in public hospitals here.

"It's how the system works ... They did not discriminate against us," he noted of his London experience.

This contrasted sharply with how quickly Singaporeans - including national carrier Singapore Airlines - reacted to the situation.

Even though doctors initially advised that Mrs Lee stay put in London for three weeks, Mr Lee decided fly her back once her condition stabilised.

And then there was the big worry that she would get a spasm onboard, he recounted.

But he needn't have worried. Within 48 hours, SIA had fitted out SQ321 with medical support of oxygen tanks and other fixtures for a drip.

"No other airline would have done this," Mr Lee said, looking visibly touched.

On board were also two Intensive Care nurses from Changi General Hospital, two doctors, as well as officials from SIA who made sure all the equipment worked.

"Everyone knows his job," said Mr Lee. "Within 12 to 13 hours, we'd reached Changi Airport. It was a big relief," he said. "Twelve to 13 hours. Your heart stops beating sometimes. We landed at Changi Airport. Great relief. I had my granddaughter (Li Xiuqi) with me. She is very fond of her grandmother. She was so relieved."

Mrs Lee was whisked off in an ambulance to Singapore General Hospital, where she is recovering.

"I think this experience has changed my granddaughter's view of Singapore," Mr Lee said.

The overseas ordeal has made him even more assured that Singapore has what it takes to succeed, despite the downturn. "It's how we respond in an emergency that determines how we fight back. And I have enormous confidence that we can fight back."

The Singapore system - with its efficiency and fighting spirit - must be kept, he said.

"You slacken, you choose the easy way, and you'd be finished," he said.

Choking back tears, he added: "I have immense confidence that in an emergency, our people respond ... If we can do that, we can succeed."

*************************************

This is a very heart wrenching post which stirs up in me great emotions. Like MM Lee's granddaughter, my view of Singapore as the most efficient nation in the world has been solidified. Can there be anymore doubt that Singapore is the safest, most efficient place to live in?

MM Lee (may peace and blessings be upon him!) is absolutely right! It is how we respond in emergencies that determine our worth as a nation. When a life is in danger, when families are at stake, it is how we respond to our fellow men and the swiftness and competency with which we act that determines the greatness of our Motherland, Singapore!

Because the PAP has created such an efficient and vigilant system and keeps our borders safe from dangerous elements like Terrorists and infectious diseases like the Bird Flu, I sleep in peace every night. And every day I give thanks to the great nation I live in and bow deeply to my esteemed political leaders. So should each of you.

Praise be to the PAP (may the PAP progress!), for they have created a nation of wealth, prosperity and efficiency! Let us all rally behind our noble and enlightened government, and support them with all our hearts!

Goh Bock Seng

Singapore is the Best Place on Earth

Singaporeans do not know how fortunate they are, and they insist on throwing their temper and hurling abuse and insults the moment something goes wrong. With such a pathetic, sloppy mindset and such lack of self-esteem, how can these fools achieve anything in life?

The PAP government (may the PAP progress!) has created a nation of unprecendented wealth, prosperity, and racial and religious harmony. Our enlightened leaders always plan for the long term and are not afraid to implement unpopular policies for the greater good our nation. With such a wise and competent government, how can Singaporeans here continue to wallow in self-pity and miss the forest for the trees?

Let us all cast aside our self-doubts and stop engaging in mindless criticism of everything that goes on around us. Instead let us rally together in the Great and Noble Cause of Nation Building, for there is Pot of Gold out there waiting to be grabbed by anyone who has the dare and the drive!

Majulah PAP! Majulah Singapura!

Goh Bock Seng

The Needy, Globalization and the PAP

A post to Sam’s Coffeeshop Forum:

Why do forummers here think that the PAP is insincere in helping the needy and less fortunate? Have you all worked at grassroots and community organizations yourself and have had first hand experience with incompetent or insincere management? Have you all taken a close look at the many programmes being offered or sponsored by the community foundations?

The PAP brought Singapore from 3rd World to 1st and created economic prosperty and racial and religious harmony. Had they been less competent in their social and political duties, today we would be far less well off as a nation and there would be thousands of Mr Tans who are driven to desperation not just financially but also in communal and religious conflict. Why does one single case of financial desperation and suicide stir up this amount of publicity? Precisely because it is rare to begin with! In other countries, Mr Tan's suicide would have counted for nothing.

Globalization is upon us whether we like it or not. We must cope with it and learn to face the challenges it brings. Railing against globalization and stomping your foot on the ground is not going to change things one iota. That's why Singaporeans have to make sacrifices when times get hard and learn to save and invest prudently when the going is good. The Great and Noble Cause of Nation Building is founded on these firm and solid premises.

And no, I am not a member of the PAP (may the PAP progress!). I am just a simple man who speaks his mind freely without fear or favour. If I twisted my views simply to make myself more popular in public forums such as this, I would be doing my viewpoint a big disfavour, and betray all those who share my views. I would be ashamed to call myself a Singaporean.

Goh Bock Seng

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sammyboymod/messages/?msg=121468.27

The Ungrateful Youth of today

While the youth of today clamour wantonly for freedom of expression and freedom of choice, they are blissfully unaware of the hard work and sacrifices undertaken by the older generation in order to achieve the prosperity and peace that they enjoy today.

Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew (praise and blessings be upon him and his family!) and the Old Guard took upon themselves the monumental task of creating a nation from scratch, of taking Singapore from 3rd World to First. Over the past 40 glorious years, they have succeeded beyond their wildest dreams. With their bare hands and sheer, almost incompehensible determination, they realized their goal of a united and independent nation --- Singapore, the land that we are today so very proud to call our Home and our Country!

They faced almost insurmountable odds in the beginning, but with persevence, diligence, and an almost superhuman wisdom, they crafted an independent and soverign Singapore where before the land was filled with communal riots, Communist elements striving to twist the politics of our land in their favour, and sheer poverty that gripped the masses. Today we are living in the land of prosperity and progress.

So let me say to the Youth of today: Be very grateful for what has been given to you, for the prosperity of our Great Motherland, Singapore, did not come easy. Singapore is offering You almost unlimited opportunities to expand your horizons, build a successful and rewarding career, and the chance of enjoying the Great Priviledge of being a citizen of a free, uncorrupt, independent and vibrant nation-state!

Embrace the Unlimited Opportunities before you, O Youth of Singapore, for Singapore is your Home and your Country, and serve our Great Nation with Pride and Distinction!

The PAP (may the PAP progress!) has guided Singapore with a firm and sure hand, making sure that the nation was always kept on a steady course towards the glorious future!

Let us praise our enlightened and independent government, for they are truly of the People, by the People, and for the People! Let us rejoice in the unbounded wisdom and intellect of MM Lee and drink from the ever-flowing fountain of his magnificence and stature. Let us close our ranks and join together in the Great Cause of Nation Building!

Praise be to the PAP, for they will guide and govern our Land to Greatness! Praise be to our government, for it is wise, courageous and resolute!

May the Great Prosperity and Blessings of Our Land be Upon the PAP, and the Good People of Singapore!

Goh Bock Seng

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sammyboymod/messages/?msg=120228.1

PAP wins every election on merit

The PAP (may the PAP progress!) has won each and every election on their own merit. They have widespread support because they have delivered consistent results all these years, and have brought peace, stability, economic progress, and racial and religious harmony to our Great Motherland, Singapore!

The PAP has fought every election fairly and has created a level playing field for all parties to take part in our great democratic process. The GRC system ensures fair representation of minority races and avails to Singaporeans the best possible parliamentary system.

Throughout these years, I am saddened that the Opposition (may they realize the folly of their ways!) has been sullied by bad hats and poor characters like JBJ, Tang Liang Hong, Jufrie Mahmud, and the likes. These people are found of slanderous and defamatory remarks and engaging in the puerile hogwash of gutter politics. Jufrie Mahmud and Tang Liang Hong were brazen chauvenists who would have brought racial harmony in Singapore to its knees had the PAP not swiftly and decisively acted to discredit their vile and putrid propaganda and seditious remarks.

You may be disappointed by the poor showing of the Opposition in the last couple of elections, but know that it is due to their own incompetence and lack of unity, rather than gerrymandering or unfair practices by the PAP. The facts speak for themselves.

Praise be to the PAP government, for they have the mandate of the People, and are the most competent and dedicated Team to lead Singapore well into the 21st Century! Praise and Blessings be to them, and let us all join ranks in this Great Cause of Nation Building!

Goh Bock Seng

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sammyboymod/messages/?msg=120042.1

O PAP! Enlighten these people here!

This is a post I made to the Sam’s Coffeeshop Forum.

O PAP! Enlighten these disillusioned people here!

I am sadden by the many disparaging remarks made against the enlightened PAP government, and especially Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew (peace and blessings be upon him!) and Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong (may MM Lee be pleased with him!).

Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew (the blessings of our land be upon him!) and the Old Guard single-handed brought Singapore from 3rd World to 1st and create a nation of prosperity, racial and religious harmony, and progress! We owe our very lives to these courageous men who fought with their lives in times of crisis, and created an independent Singapore that we all can be proud of.

The PAP government (may the PAP progress!) has delivered on its promises all these years and brought economic prosperity and social progress to our nation. The good they have achieved for Singapore is something we can all share, and which we should all be eternally grateful for. Let us champion the Great Cause of Nation Building and unite behind the PAP, for it is the best government in the region, Asia and beyond!

Let us support all the PAP policies, for they are geared towards the long term good of the nation! Let us welcome all foreigners with open arms, for they create jobs in the long run, make our economy more competitive, and add vibrance and life to our nation! Let us hope many of them will choose to make Singapore their home, so we can all join together in this Great Cause!

Praise MM Lee, for his work will last for generations!

Love Him, for he is Great!

Fear Him, for he is resolute!

Learn from Him, for he is wise!

And last but not least ... WORSHIP Him, for he is God!

The peace and blessings of all the land be upon MM Lee, PM Lee, and the PAP! Amen!

Goh Bock Seng

http://forums.delphiforums.com/sammyboymod/messages/?msg=119754.1

On Being Anti-Establishment

My post on the Sammyboy Coffeshop forum: http://forums.delphiforums.com/sammyboymod/messages/?msg=122391.1

I have recently watched the famous video clip on YouTube of an RJC teacher lecturing a student, tearing up his answer script, and calling him a slimy old rat.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kfYT88rEe78

At one point during the scolding, she complains about the student presenting anti-establishment views, and strongly suggests that such fringe views are less than worthy.

Which exactly constitutes being anti-establishment?

In current day usage, being anti-establishment means generally disagreeing with our adminstration or our leaders, going against the grain and the norm, or expressing strong discontent with the rules, principles or policies laid down by the management.

Most forummers here I believe would consider themselves anti-establishment.

If there is a genuine greviance against how things are done, and there are sound reasons why the administration is pursuing the wrong policies or embracing the wrong philosophies, there is absolutely nothing wrong with being anti-establishment. In fact, it is only though rigorous debate and active campaigning that we get things to change for the better. Being anti-establishment is valid if based on concrete and sound reasons.

Unfortunately, many of our youth today (and indeed, many forummers here) are anti-establishment simply because they feel it is cool to disagree, that there is more dignity going against the grain and challenging authority rather than conforming to the norm. Many folk think it is more noble to reject authority and criticise everything that goes on around them. They think people who constantly give praise to what is being done right are weak-minded and silly. To them, counting one's blessings is the act of an apologist and is the anti-thesis of progress or change.

I vehemently disagree with this stance.

The youth of today are living in the most prosperous period of human history, and the opportunities for them to grow and gain valuable experiences are immense. Rather than fussing over every little thing that does wrong in their lives and blaming the government for every last nuance, they should indeed ask themselves who gave them the good life that they live today. They should ask themselves who fought with their very lives and brought our Great Motherland from 3rd World to 1st with almost superhuman grit and determination. They should ask themselves not what our country can do for them, but what they can do for our country.

Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew (praise and blessings be upon him!) and the Old Guard created a nation of peace, prosperty, and racial and religious harmony. The youth of today should learn from where their Great Blessings come from, pull up their socks, and face the challenges of the world with a positive mental attitude.

Let us not wallow in petty arguments and narrow mindsets. Let us instead press on and rally together in the Great and Noble Cause of Nation Building! There is a Pot Of Gold out there, waiting to be grabbed by all who have the drive and the dare!

Praise be to the PAP, and our Great Leaders! Majulah PAP! Majulah Singapura!

Goh Bock Seng